Discipleship: Not a Skill, But a Story
Chris: Hey everybody, welcome to
the ordinary discipleship
podcast. My name is Chris. I'm
here with Jacob, and also the
one and only Jesse. Today we are
talking about discipleship and
leadership and how to train
discipleship so many times in
churches that you walk into a
church and right away
discipleship is like you need to
take foundations 101
foundations, 102 foundations,
103 and once you get to
foundations 104 then you will be
a full disciple of Jesus with
all access to heaven, not
necessarily true. I think so
many times we think we we defer
real discipleship to programs
and we train for leadership, but
we we shape for discipleship.
Everybody thinks that maturity
is a skill to be developed, but
it's actually a story to be
written. I wish I could take
credit for that beautiful line,
but that was the one and only.
Jacob Hoyer, Jacob, talk to us,
buddy about this, programs,
leadership, discipleship, what
is going on out there? It's a
crazy world.
Jacob: Yeah. I mean, I think,
like the the 101102103104
situation you were just
describing is like there was a
period in the American church
where we were really focused on,
hey, how many people can we
reach? Let's get some volume
here, efficiency. And so we
created discipleship systems
that were highly efficient. But
in order to do that, what we did
was we, we said, All right, what
a disciple is for our church. It
means everybody looking the
same, and then, and then we can
just train for it, and the
problem is they're like and so
this is actually how we end up
with leadership and discipleship
being confused around hoology,
we would say leadership and
discipleship are two different
things, and there are other
people who would disagree, and a
part of that is because what
they're saying is we we can
train you to be a disciple.
Well, we would disagree. We'd
say, well, we can train you in
the skills of leadership, but
actually, discipleship is less
about that's what we said. It's
less about a skill to be
developed and more about a story
to be written. Because we say
that discipleship is being
changed by Jesus. In order to do
that, we need to look at what
God is doing in our life and
allow God to help us reauthor
Our narrative. That's how
discipleship happens. And so you
can't do that in a one size fits
all. It has to be sort of a
bespoke solution, like a person
by person sort of thing. Doesn't
mean you can't have a curriculum
or a pathway that people can
walk, but it means that along
the way, it needs to have the
adaptability for the individual.
Jessie Cruickshank: Yeah, I
mean, just think about like, the
kinds of people who don't make
it in those types of programs,
right? Let's say you're not good
in school. You're probably not
gonna go through this class, you
know, or the series of class, or
you'll do one, and then you'll
be like, Oh my gosh, this is
like school and, you know, or
maybe you don't have good
reading comprehension, and
that's a that's a significant
part of the population that
don't really learn deeply
through reading. They need they
need conversation. Or, let's say
you have somebody like in in the
church that I go to, it's very
blue collar, it's very salt of
the earth. If someone came in
here and I was like, Hey, pick
out the people who you think are
leaders, quote, unquote, like
they probably wouldn't pick out
anybody, because the people that
are in like roles with
responsibility are former drug
addicts and former prostitutes
and a guy who is homeless and
has a homeless missionary
ministry like those are the
people who are stakeholders in
our congregation. And you
wouldn't look at them and go,
Oh, that's leadership material.
I need to get them into a class.
I need to get them into, you
know, this program and and so
for me, I think about all the
people who aren't going to feel
successful, valued, qualified in
the narrowness of what those
classes usually look like,
right? So how do we, how do we
think about discipleship in a
way that everyone is qualified,
that everyone has is released to
make another disciple?
Chris: So then I rewind a little
bit, and I wonder why this has
kind of been the the mode that
most churches take. Like, if
you're talking about a big
church, a discipleship is
usually a class, and I feel like
maybe they did that because it's
easy. Like it's easy to throw 50
people in the discipleship one
on one class and to have a
conversation with them, as
opposed to trying to train
people up and do one on one
discipleship, especially in
bigger churches. So I don't
know, like,
Jacob: Well, I think that like,
so what I hear you saying is,
yeah, I'll practice by
listening. He's good at that,
because we talked about that the
last. Last episode, we just
recorded what you're you're
going well, if we are sitting
here around our microphones
talking about why it's such a
bad idea to try to try to create
Jesus widgets, why is that?
Sometimes the pattern that we
see, I would say that, like the
models of church that we've
inherited from the past, might
have been the right models for
their time. So it doesn't mean
that those models have always
been bad or a bad fit. It just
means that maybe we're in a
different time now, and this is
where, like, if we go to like,
1940 to 1960 everybody in
America just kind of assumed
everybody, or their neighbors,
were Christian, and the way that
we did church was just, well,
you're all going to church,
right? Yeah, so this is the best
church for you. And I think like
as some of these models were
developed, there was more of an
assumption of a certain set of
values, and there were certain
conversations happening in
homes. And so what the church
was doing was educating on
things. Now I think we're in a
different season where people's
lives aren't imbued with Chris,
with quote, unquote, Christian
culture for better and for
worse. So like we can bemoan it,
but also, there are some
benefits to the fact that
people's formation isn't just
happening through the culture.
And so there were times when
what the church needed to offer
was a set of classes that time
is not now, any longer, unless
Jesse, or Yeah, one of you can
disagree with
Jessie Cruickshank: me. I do. I
do. I disagree a little bit
because I think about like my my
grad work is in experiential
education, how in brain science
education, educational brain
science and so we disciple the
same way that we the way that we
think people learn and the way
that we think people learn for
the last 150 years, comes out of
this idea that people are blank
slates. So Freud. This comes
from Freud. Freud got he was
nobody in Europe liked Freud.
They were all Jungian, right? So
they all like Carl Jung and they
said, Oh, Freud, that guy's a
joker and a coke addict who has
got like, issues with his mom.
So nobody listened to him. But
we do what we do in North
America, and we're like, oh,
we'll take Europe's crazy, which
we do all the time. And so we
said, okay, yeah, Freud, this
guy, we're a blank slate. So
let's create a school system
where we write on the blank
slate. It's called Tabua rasa.
We write on these blank slates
of kids, and we put them through
this, this process of grade one,
grade two, grade three, grade
four, and each grade writes
their information on their blank
slate. And we get at the end,
and this was the goal. The goal
was a normal person. And we do
this in discipleship. We just
call it making people look like
Jesus. We don't think about what
God is doing in their life,
their personality. Just like
schools are not designed for
people with personalities,
neither is most discipleship
classness. So we took the way
that we thought about school,
which is not biologically
correct, and we apply that. And
then in the 50s, in the 60s, so
we have a school like process.
But now, instead of the goal
being normal people, we have
this value of the exceptional,
the amazing, the Superman and
and we think that I don't want
to be normal. I want to be or
average. I want to be above
average. So now we're going to
design a process that will
highlight and illuminate the
people who are better at this
than others. We're going to tell
them they're called we're going
to put them in a leadership
pipeline. We're going to
cultivate them, and we're going
to we're going to invest extra
resources in the ones who are
really responsive, is how we
talk about it. So we added this
process of school. We added to
it of in the 50s and the 60s, a
value of the exclusive, the
extraordinary, the better than
and now we're going to just, you
know, we and then we just
maximized this in churches. We
didn't question it. We didn't
question the paradigm or the
narrative of that whole thing.
So in so we think, Well, we're
just going to develop the skills
to help everybody be an
exceptional Christian. Instead
of what story is God trying to
write through their life? It's,
it's a it's an opposite
direction from what I think God
is trying to do, and what I see
in the scriptures, what I see
Jesus do with people. Jesus
didn't put people through a
program process and sit down the
12 Disciples and say, Okay,
well, we're here's here. We're
going to talk about this part of
theology, and then we're going
to talk about this part of
theology like it's not, it's not
what he
Chris: did. So okay, I can, I
can understand what you're
saying. But what does a big
church do? Like, how do they do
discipleship? Because we're
talking about the problem, we've
identified the problem, but how
do we move forward?
Jacob: Systems aren't bad,
right? Right, but the the goals
of the systems might be, or the
assumptions about who people are
that are embedded in the systems
and so and so, that's what we're
saying. Is like, it doesn't mean
that you cannot have a
systematic approach to
discipleship. It's just that
your your systematic approach
needs to design for relationship
and agency and individuality and
so and that's where like on if I
wonder if Jesse and I could lead
a church together, because we
probably actually have pretty
different philosophies on
discipleship systems, and they
both can work, right? So to the
question of, What does a big
church do? I would say, well, we
have a friend, Dave Rhodes, who
says, Every big church needs to
learn how to get small, and
every small church needs to
learn how to get big. And so
it's about, if I'm a big church,
the question is, how do I create
environments where church can
feel small, and if I'm a small
church, how do I communicate to
the community that my impact can
be big?
Chris: It's so funny that you
just said that we have a big,
mega church in Orlando, and they
recently spent a ton of money
making their sanctuary look
smaller. And I could not
understand, for the life of me,
like why they did that, because
they they they fill up every
week, but they made intentional
efforts to make it look like a
smaller space. So I don't know
that it's off topic, but kind of
what you're just
Jessie Cruickshank: No, no,
it's, it is? It is an
interesting phenomenon. So like,
if we think about the way the
brain was designed and the
optimal size for a learning
environment, not for an
information dump, passive, but
like, let's have a conversation.
I'm going to learn this in my
story, in my autobiographical
memory, I'm experienced this
that group size is 12. So it
doesn't matter how many your
mass gathering is, whether
that's 50 or 5000 if you can
create systems where you can
have chunks of 1212, people
gathering and they're discussing
and they're wrestling, then they
are going to have the
opportunity to actually learn
things in a deep way, because at
the end of the day, our goal is
mature Christians, not
volunteers in a program, and so
that's what Jacob's talking
about. The goals of the system
may be what's wrong, and our
goals have been, they haven't
been maturity. They haven't been
spiritual maturity. They've
been, well, the best way for me
to disciple somebody is to put
them into a volunteer position,
and now they're leading
something, and the church
becomes the end and the the
recipient of everybody's growth,
when really it's supposed to be
the neighborhood and the
community and their workplaces.
That's what should be receiving
the fruit of their
transformation, not the inside
of the church. So we can get
chunks of 12. I don't care if
you have five of those or 5
million of those, that's the
optimal size. And we can just
figure out the systems to equip
and support chunks of 12.
Chris: Okay, so you have, let's
say you're a smaller church. You
have 120 people. You break them
into chunks of 12. You have 10
chunks of 12. You equip leaders.
But now, what are you doing?
Jesse, like, what are you doing
with those 12?
Jacob: Yeah, and I would say,
like, I wouldn't even
necessarily say it's you've got
120 people, break them into 10
chunks of 12. But I think what
you want to do is, I think with
those 120 people, you start to
train them for relationship, and
they will naturally congregate
into groups of 12 that may be
static or maybe shifting, and
it's in those spaces where
they're going to grow. And so
it's about, how are we coming
alongside of people to give them
the resources they need when the
opportunity arises?
Chris: So let me, let me, let
me. Stop you there. Train them
to be better at relationship.
Break that down. What's that
mean?
Jacob: So it's things about,
like, how do we rupture and
repair? Like, how do we how do
we offend one another and come
back to the table? How do we
learn to listen to one another
so that when we speak
encouragement, it's actually
received as encouragement. How
do we like so things like that?
Yeah.
Jessie Cruickshank: How do we
see one another? How do we ask
God, what God is doing in their
life? How do we listen, as Jacob
said, listen to them. How do we
hold space with them? How do we
try not to fix them and deal
with with the pain that comes
from sin, not just in their own
life, but the life of everyone
who's journeying with them? We
don't teach people how to do
that, and so we they like, Oh,
you got messy. I can't handle
you. And we let that be okay,
instead of specifically training
and talking to people about how
to be with each other in those
hard growth spaces, which we'll
have another podcast on. But
like if we talk to people about
that and we give them
opportunities to cluster,
formally or informally, i. They
will naturally have the growth
conversations.
Chris: So in those groups that
you spoke of, like, obviously,
there's got to be some kind of
leader or disciple maker in
those groups, I would imagine,
right? And what's that? Or,
okay,
Jessie Cruickshank: or everyone
in that group as a disciple
maker, and maybe you have a
convener. Maybe it's just a
host, maybe you have a
facilitator. But if it's just a
smaller version of a church
service, if you still just have
one person teaching everyone
else, that's not what we're
talking about. That's not a
discipleship group. That's,
there are other words for it.
There's, you know, it's
something else. So you can have
a host that doesn't have to know
anything, a convener doesn't
have to know anything. You can
use discovery Bible questions is
your four questions, what does
this pass that you read a
passage of scripture and you ask
the group, what does this teach
me about God? What does this
teach me about myself? What does
this teach me about others? And
who do I need to share this
with? That's it, and that what
that requires is trust in the
Holy Spirit. That requires not
trust in the knowledge of the
information of someone who's
been trained in a skill, but
trust in the Holy Spirit to lead
people into all truth, because
the Holy Spirit knows the story
he's writing in everyone's life.
And they're, they're tangibly,
palpably different environments,
Jacob: like I'll run to a
different example if I can. I
spoke to a couple that was a
part of a large church, and they
led a small group at that large
church. And they were, they were
speaking to me, because we have
friends in common who are part
of our church, which is a small
church, and they knew that we
talk a lot about community. And
I went over to their house late
one night, and they said to me,
we have this problem. All of our
friends, the people we feel
called to be in life, on life
with at our church, are also
leaders of small groups and our
the people, the staff at our
church, tell us we can't be in a
group together because we all
have to lead groups. And they
felt like they are telling all
of us that we have to lead
groups, and so we don't like
we're spending all of our time
just leading curriculum in
groups. Yeah, we don't actually
have time to be in relationship
with each other in a way that
can actually help us grow. That
stinks, and that's where, like,
that's where I'm saying, like,
the goal there is, how many
groups can we make? Because we
know everybody has to be in a
group, so let's make as many
groups as possible, and every
group has to have a leader. And
it's like the original
motivation was good. Let's
disciple people, but when the
system dominates the objective,
then everything falls apart.
Jessie Cruickshank: So this is
where the conviction that the
goal is spiritual maturity,
because and not a volunteer to
perpetuate a church program,
because, if the goal in that
situation that Jacob just
described with spiritual
maturity, be like, Oh, well,
these people aren't growing
either. Like, like, they need an
opportunity to, you know, have
that encouragement and that that
that Iron sharpens. Iron pure,
you know, sharpening dynamic and
but obviously, you know, but if
that's not the goal, you're
gonna make decisions in a, you
know, towards a different end.
Even though your small groups
exist in either in either
example,
Chris: it's a lot because, like,
we just finished our first
season of small groups at my
small church, and we had six of
them and and the most powerful
ones were, I just had this young
adult group where they just
played pickleball, and then they
read a psalm afterwards. And I,
like, was so good. It was so
good. They had so many new
Christians like come and and I'm
going to lead one next season,
where it's just, let's go out to
eat every Tuesday, and let's
just talk and get to know each
other. And I think sometimes in
the church world, we're so hyper
focused on we've got to do a
Bible study. We've got to do
this. And you kind of, and
that's good. There's nothing
against that, but you kind of
overstep or forsake like the
relational aspects sometimes in
it, because you're trying to
push curriculum as opposed to
the relationship. I think that's
super important. Yeah, wow.
Okay, this was good. This helped
me. Thank you guys. A lot to
take away here. You two are
great. Okay, well, that's going
to do it for this episode of the
ordinary discipleship podcast.
Please, if this was helpful to
you, rate us on wherever you
download your podcast, leave a
review so other people can find
us and Jesse Jacob, why don't
you talk a little bit about what
you two do together? Go ahead,
Jacob, you've been
Jacob: you're such a we are.
We're developing content around
neuro and. Form discipleship
resources. That's what we call
it. So you can find more of
books, podcasts,
courses@hoology.co that's W, H,
O, o, l, o, G, y.co, and you can
find it there.
Chris: That's awesome. That
sounds really smart stuff.
That's good. And guarantee you
guys disciple people 98% better
than any other program. That's
what I heard. Is that true?
That's again, that's or your or
your money back, that's what I
heard. I didn't know if that
Jessie Cruickshank: charges for
discipleship. How did you get
that gig? Yeah.
Chris: Anyway, I think that's
gonna do it for today. Ladies
and gentlemen. Thank you so
much. God bless you. Thanks for
joining us for another ride on
the discipleship podcast. God
bless See ya. Bye. You.
Creators and Guests

